T. Griekspoor
To Win
V. Kopriva
To Win
Jan Choinski vs Vit Kopriva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W W L L
Form
W W W W W W W L W WHead-2-Head: Choinski 1 - 1 Kopriva
They have played 5 sets in total, with Choinski winning 2 and Kopriva winning 3. The last match between Choinski and Kopriva was at the Tulln Challenger, 03-09-2024, First, Clay with Jan Choinski getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Choinski | 1 |
| Vit Kopriva | 1 |
Tulln Challenger(03-09-2024)
1
6
6
3
6
4
| Choinski | Stats | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (19-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 183 | Ranking | 95 |
| 126 | Highest Rank | 95 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 11 |
| 59% (386-273) | Career Total W/L | 60% (387-260) |
| $285,015 | Career Prize Money | $510,660 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jan Choinski
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 18 | Games Won | 25 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:58:37 | Average Match Time | 1:58:37 |
| 58% (82/142) | 1st Serve % | 60% (94/157) |
| 61% (50/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (63/94) |
| 48% (29/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (30/63) |
| 23% (5/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 41% (64/157) | Return Points Win % | 44% (63/142) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jan Choinski
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jan Choinski
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Arthur Gea
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jan Choinski
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Philip Henning
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Valentin Royer
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Borna Gojo
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Calvin Hemery
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Raphael Collignon
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (386/273) | Win/Loss | 60% (387/260) |
| 57% (868/658) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (856/655) |
| 53% (7530/6696) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7348/6535) |
| 54% (60/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (87/57) |
| 62% (219/133) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (273/174) |
| 59% (104/73) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (23/26) |
| 17% (3/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1752 | Aces Total | 1616 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 1667 |
| 1:20:7 | Average Match Time | 1:39:43 |
| 478.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.56 |
| 65% (24204/37035) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25236/41990) |
| 68% (16390/24204) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (16522/25236) |
| 51% (6595/12831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8279/16753) |
| 44% (1658/3798) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2297/4878) |
| 40% (15050/37223) | Return Points Win % | 43% (18501/42690) |
| 38% (6/10) | Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 36% (10/18) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (22/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (144/130) | Challenger W/L | 57% (157/118) |
| 67% (225/113) | Futures W/L | 64% (190/107) |
| 59% (374/639) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (378/634) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (6/8) |
| 53% (96/182) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (79/149) |
| 52% (106/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (130/213) |
| 88% (369/326) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (350/308) |
| 12% (369/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (350/42) |
| 20% (289/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (296/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
